Modern Indian Sculpture
The basic characteristics and problems of contemporary Indian Sculpture are very similar to those of contemporary painting. If anything, it is even more alienated from the great Indian tradition, though and even more strongly hinged to the modern, eclectic, international concept.
It began in the academic style, based on mid-Victorian ideas of naturalism and smugness, and was a legacy of the British. This mannerism was perpetrated in the government art schools and colleges established around the century in Bombay, Calcutta, Madras and elsewhere. The inane achievement of this so called realist or naturalist school never even attained the height of real academic excellence and has remained a far cry from the iconographic, symbolical and religious ideals of Indian sculpture through the ages.
And then, when our sculpture was freed of this yoke, towards the 'forties' it looked again as in painting, to the western world for inspiration, resulting in similar processes of experimentation and eclectic exercise. From then on the story of contemporary Indian sculpture is the story of a transition from academism to well-defined non-objectivism. We have been introduced to new and unconventional materials, most certainly in the manner of employing them, such as, sheet metal, welded bric-a-brac wire, plastic, hardware and junk. Here and there, our sculptors may have achieved worthwhile results in tune with the milieu, but this achievement is not comparable with the results attained in the field in the shape of a renewed interest in folk and tribal art. But, largely, the preoccupation is still with shape and form, polish and texture and mid-way abstraction. Contemporary Indian sculpture has not shown either the speed or variety of painting and has not arrived at the logical 'cul de sac' which in the case of painting has provided the necessary height and perspective to a meaningful introspection, which is called the 'Journey's End' is a symbolical painting that reaches beyond the explicit pictorial elements of the work. The crouching, gasping camel set against an arid desert in the twilight hours has a relevance to life in general.
![]() |
Painting : 'Woman plucking flowers' by Gagendranath Tagore |
Nandalal Bose is regarded as the most distinguished pupil of Abanindranath Tagore and his influence was considerable on more than one generation of artists. In the painting of a woman in the act of doing 'Pranam' one sees both simplicity and directness of his pictorialism as also the significant impact on his work of the vitality of folk art.
Kshitindranath Majumdar was also a renowned pupil of Abanindranath. The beautiful picture of Spring owes its inspiration to the Indian miniatures. Kshitindranath was known for his soft palette and the grace and lyrical quality of his drawing. He is almost unique in this respect.
![]() |
Painting : 'Pujarins' by Jamini Roy |
Jamini Roy was a contemporary of the artists mentioned above, but he, more than anyone else, sought an entirely different path of expression, which had a tremendous impact on subsequent painters, deeply inspired by the Bengal folk tradition. His images and ideas as in this painting of 'Pujarinis' are direct, singularly stylised, and conceived in emphatic flat spaces and strong lines.
Ganganendranath Tagore shared very much with the painters of the Indian Renaissance but, he, like the distinguished poet-painter Rabindranath, was an individualist of an extraordinary order. His paintings have something considerably common with cubistic approach as in this fantastic study of the magician. His paintings are distinguished for his individualistic, highly dramatic concept of light and shadow.
Abdur Rahman Chughtai was greatly inspired by the Bengal School. But he was equally influenced by Persian thought and art, and with these two he developed a style of his own romantic and poetic with flowing lines and a palette to match his nostalgic mood. The study of a Head in an example of the work of Rabindranath Tagore who took to painting in his late years under an irrepressible urge. His images come forth from the subconscious regions, from dream and fantasy and have an archetypal quality. K. Sreenivasulu like Jamini Roy, was greatly moved by folk art and rural life. By virtue of the directness, decorative effects and stylisation, his work should be understood along with Jamini Roy's. Sreenivasulu drew much inspiration from the art heritage of South India, particularly from the mural tradition of Tanjavur and Lepakshi. With A.A. Almelkar we enter a different phase of contemporary Indian painting. It is still largely inspired, both in technique and figurative, by Indian miniature and mural tradition. But one can see the very individualistic approach to the compositional problems which had marked a departure ideologically. |